|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Scotsman Howard
S0utherN Comfort
Test Alliance Please Ignore
130
   |
Posted - 2016.06.10 13:05:27 -
[1] - Quote
LOL Thank you CCP: As it stands right now I have won a bet with an old corp mate on the Nag. I bet him that the fitting requirements would not be changed enough to compensate for the added gun. Based on the current numbers (+60 CPU lol) I win that bet.
Now it remains to be seen what you will do about the damage bonus. I said it would be changed to compensate (something like +33%) and keep the DPS the same, but that does not look like it will happen.
Who knows, we may wash on this bet.
As for the rest of the changes, I do not get why we are already nerfing shield extenders. The only thing I can think of is you guys are getting ready to unveil those implants that increase raw shield HP (snakes but for shields). In that case, shouldn't we wait? |
Scotsman Howard
S0utherN Comfort
Test Alliance Please Ignore
130
|
Posted - 2016.06.10 13:08:38 -
[2] - Quote
Scotsman Howard wrote:LOL Thank you CCP: As it stands right now I have won a bet with an old corp mate on the Nag. I bet him that the fitting requirements would not be changed enough to compensate for the added gun. Based on the current numbers (+60 CPU lol) I win that bet.
Now it remains to be seen what you will do about the damage bonus. I said it would be changed to compensate (something like +33%) and keep the DPS the same, but that does not look like it will happen.
Who knows, we may wash on this bet.
As for the rest of the changes, I do not get why we are already nerfing shield extenders. The only thing I can think of is you guys are getting ready to unveil those implants that increase raw shield HP (snakes but for shields). In that case, shouldn't we wait?
It looks like CCP has the new armor repair amount implants on SISI now, so I would expect new shield implants to be coming. |
Scotsman Howard
S0utherN Comfort
Test Alliance Please Ignore
130
|
Posted - 2016.06.10 14:21:15 -
[3] - Quote
Aebe Amraen wrote:Scotsman Howard wrote:Now it remains to be seen what you will do about the damage bonus. I said it would be changed to compensate (something like +33%) and keep the DPS the same, but that does not look like it will happen. 3 guns with no damage bonus does exactly the same DPS as the old 2 guns with 50% damage bonus. Please either learn to do basic arithmetic or post on an out-of-alliance alt, you're embarrassing us.
The math is the same yes, but that assumes the same fitting. With the current fitting needs to 3 guns, any fit is going to need to be rethought which could result in a decrease in DPS. That is why if you were to look at my statement as a whole instead of quoting just the last portion, you would have seen the first part I addressed was the fitting requirements.
Man, I am SOOO sorry I embarrassed you (I hardly doubt Test itself is embarrassed by a comment on the forums and if so, it is not the one you referenced). Now had you asked me to clarify my statement, I would have happily done that. No need to bash an alliance mate or anyone on the forums, but I understand why you did it. We all know that a forum post (if gone unanswered or not acknowledged in anyway) will bring about the end of any alliance. |
Scotsman Howard
S0utherN Comfort
Test Alliance Please Ignore
131
|
Posted - 2016.06.14 16:50:13 -
[4] - Quote
Darkwing Fiftytwo wrote:Carriers should have a recall delay on their drones so they cant deploy alpha a ship and then immediately have them back in their bays.
Add a timer.
No because they have the delay built into when they return (they would have to rearm that one missile volley).
This sort of timer servers no purpose as it is the same thing for drones (you can launch and recall all you want). |
|
|
| |
|